Schley County School DistrictBudget & Spending
Ellaville, Schley County, Georgia NCES 1304470
- Total revenue · FY2024
- $18.4M $18,367,000
- Students enrolled
- 1,231
- Revenue per pupil
- $14,920
- Local share per pupil
- $3,569 4th percentile in GA
Transparency grade C, provisional
Under reviewProvisional grade
Every district starts at a provisional C until its records have been reviewed. This is a starting point, not a finding.
If you work for this district, you can shorten the wait by sending us links to the records you already publish.
NCES F-33 · FY2024
Where the money goes
Operating and capital spending from the federal expenditure survey, rolled up by function.
Aggregate categories only: no individual payees or contracts are shown.
- Instruction
- $10.2M 53.9% of spending
- Administration
- $1.1M 5.7% of spending
- Per pupil
- $15,438 All functions
- Instruction 53.9%
- Capital Outlay 11.7%
- Student Transportation 7.8%
- Student Support Services 6.8%
- Operations & Maintenance 5.2%
- Food Services 4.7%
- General Administration 3.1%
- School Administration 2.6%
- Business & Central Services 2.2%
- Instructional Staff Support 2.0%
- Other Support Services 0.1%
- Other Programs 0.0%
View the numbers as a table
| Function | Amount | Per pupil | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $10,244,000 | $8,322 | 53.9% |
| Capital Outlay | $2,215,000 | $1,799 | 11.7% |
| Student Transportation | $1,485,000 | $1,206 | 7.8% |
| Student Support Services | $1,292,000 | $1,050 | 6.8% |
| Operations & Maintenance | $990,000 | $804 | 5.2% |
| Food Services | $885,000 | $719 | 4.7% |
| General Administration | $589,000 | $478 | 3.1% |
| School Administration | $487,000 | $396 | 2.6% |
| Business & Central Services | $417,000 | $339 | 2.2% |
| Instructional Staff Support | $379,000 | $308 | 2.0% |
| Other Support Services | $14,000 | $11 | 0.1% |
| Other Programs | $7,000 | $6 | 0.0% |
| Total | $19,004,000 | $15,438 | 100% |
NCES F-33 · FY2005–FY2024
How this has changed
Summary Four points on FY2005 to FY2024
- Operating balance and scale In FY2024 the district reported $18.4M in revenue against $16.8M in current operating spending. It took in $1.6M more than it spent on operations, a margin of 8.6% of revenue. A further $2.2M went to capital outlay, 11.5% of total spending, which is typically financed by borrowing rather than out of revenue. This compares revenue with operating cost only; it is not a fund balance and not an audited result.
- Inflation and real growth Consumer prices rose +60.6% between FY2005 and FY2024. Revenue rose +73.3% and operating spending +97.2% in nominal terms. Revenue outgrew inflation, gaining +7.9% in purchasing power. Operating spending outgrew inflation, gaining +22.8% in purchasing power.
- Enrollment and per-pupil cost Enrollment fell by 20 students, -1.6%. Operating spending per student went from $6,807 to $13,639, +100.4% nominal and +24.8% after inflation.
- Structural takeaway Operating spending grew faster than revenue, by 23.8 percentage points over the period, with real cost per student rising while enrollment fell, so fewer students are carrying a larger real cost base. These figures describe cost, not performance: the F-33 does not say what a district was funded to do, and this site scores what a district publishes rather than how it spends.
Generated from the figures in the table below, not written by hand and not written by a model. Change the years and it recalculates.
| Measure | FY2005 | FY2024 | Change | Nominal % | Real % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $10,596,000 | $18,367,000 | +$7,771,000 | +73.3% | +7.9% |
| Total expenditure | $9,064,000 | $19,278,000 | +$10,214,000 | +112.7% | +32.4% |
| Revenue per pupil | $8,470 | $14,920 | +$6,450 | +76.2% | +9.7% |
| Students enrolled | 1,251 | 1,231 | -20 | -1.6% | — |
Percent change from each measure's FY2005 level. Dollar figures are nominal as filed; the real column removes inflation using CPI-U, U.S. city average, all items, annual average (BLS). The dashed line is that same inflation curve, so a dollar line above it gained purchasing power and one below it lost. It does not apply to enrollment. Hover any point for the underlying number.
100-point rubric
What Schley County School District needs for an A
-
Public check register
14 ptsEvery disbursement published with payee category, date, amount, and fund, updated at least quarterly.
A check register records where money actually went, rather than where it was budgeted to go.
-
Annual financial audit
6 ptsA current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report with the independent auditor opinion attached.
A financial audit confirms the statements are accurately presented. Most states require one, so it is a floor rather than a distinction.
-
Performance or efficiency audit
5 ptsAn independent review of whether spending achieved its stated purpose, published within the last three years.
A financial audit asks whether the numbers are right. A performance audit asks whether the money did what it was meant to do, which is the question a taxpayer is usually asking.
-
Line-item adopted budget
11 ptsThe adopted budget broken out by function and object code, not a summary presentation.
Function and object detail is what allows classroom and central office spending to be compared.
-
Purchasing card transactions
9 ptsPurchasing and credit card transaction detail with merchant category, date, and amount.
Card purchases sit outside the standard purchase-order process, so separate disclosure is what makes them reviewable.
-
Payment history by category
9 ptsCumulative payments grouped by spending category, covering at least one full fiscal year.
Category totals show concentration and recurring commitments that individual payments do not.
-
Machine-readable data
9 ptsFinancial data offered as CSV, XLSX, JSON, or an open API rather than scanned images.
A scanned PDF is technically public and practically difficult to analyse. Open formats make review possible.
-
Compensation schedule
7 ptsCurrent salary schedules and aggregate administrator compensation bands, including stipends.
Payroll is the largest line in most district budgets, so schedule-level disclosure covers the bulk of spending.
-
Bond and capital disclosure
7 ptsBond program spending reported against the specific projects voters approved, with remaining balances.
Bond funds are borrowed against future taxes and authorised for a named project list, so reporting against that list closes the loop.
-
Board minutes and agendas
7 ptsMinutes and agenda packets posted together with the financial exhibits that were voted on.
The vote and its attachment are what connect a decision to the money it moved.
-
Contracts posted
6 ptsExecuted contracts and amendments above the district bid threshold, posted in full.
A payment shows the amount. The contract shows what was promised in return.
-
Direct download, no request
6 ptsCore financial records download directly, with no records request, login, or fee.
Publishing a record and releasing it on request are different levels of disclosure.
-
Published records process
4 ptsA public records page naming the responsible officer, the statutory timeline, and any fees.
A documented process tells a requester what to expect before they file.
No items have been checked yet. These fill in as each record is located and verified.