School Admin District 20Budget & Spending
Fort Fairfield, Aroostook County, Maine NCES 2310890
- Total revenue · FY2024
- $9.0M $9,040,000
- Students enrolled
- 473
- Revenue per pupil
- $19,112
- Local share per pupil
- $5,125 3th percentile in ME
Transparency grade C, provisional
Under reviewProvisional grade
Every district starts at a provisional C until its records have been reviewed. This is a starting point, not a finding.
If you work for this district, you can shorten the wait by sending us links to the records you already publish.
NCES F-33 · FY2024
Where the money goes
Operating and capital spending from the federal expenditure survey, rolled up by function. Aggregate categories only: no individual payees or contracts are shown.
- Instruction
- $5.1M 56.6% of spending
- Administration
- $358K 4.0% of spending
- Per pupil
- $18,966 All functions
- Instruction 56.6%
- Student Transportation 12.2%
- Student Support Services 6.8%
- Operations & Maintenance 5.6%
- Business & Central Services 5.0%
- Food Services 3.8%
- Instructional Staff Support 3.5%
- General Administration 2.5%
- School Administration 1.5%
- Other Support Services 1.3%
- Capital Outlay 1.2%
View the numbers as a table
| Function | Amount | Per pupil | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $5,077,000 | $10,734 | 56.6% |
| Student Transportation | $1,094,000 | $2,313 | 12.2% |
| Student Support Services | $610,000 | $1,290 | 6.8% |
| Operations & Maintenance | $503,000 | $1,063 | 5.6% |
| Business & Central Services | $449,000 | $949 | 5.0% |
| Food Services | $340,000 | $719 | 3.8% |
| Instructional Staff Support | $318,000 | $672 | 3.5% |
| General Administration | $227,000 | $480 | 2.5% |
| School Administration | $131,000 | $277 | 1.5% |
| Other Support Services | $116,000 | $245 | 1.3% |
| Capital Outlay | $106,000 | $224 | 1.2% |
| Total | $8,971,000 | $18,966 | 100% |
NCES F-33 · FY2015–FY2024
How this has changed
| Measure | FY2015 | FY2024 | Change | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $6,961,000 | $9,040,000 | +$2,079,000 | +29.9% |
| Total expenditure | $6,688,000 | $9,027,000 | +$2,339,000 | +35.0% |
| Revenue per pupil | $12,963 | $19,112 | +$6,149 | +47.4% |
| Students enrolled | 537 | 473 | -64 | -11.9% |
Percent change from each measure's FY2015 level. Nominal dollars as filed, not adjusted for inflation. Hover any point for the underlying number.
100-point rubric
What School Admin District 20 needs for an A
-
Public check register
14 ptsEvery disbursement published with payee category, date, amount, and fund, updated at least quarterly.
A check register records where money actually went, rather than where it was budgeted to go.
-
Annual financial audit
6 ptsA current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report with the independent auditor opinion attached.
A financial audit confirms the statements are accurately presented. Most states require one, so it is a floor rather than a distinction.
-
Performance or efficiency audit
5 ptsAn independent review of whether spending achieved its stated purpose, published within the last three years.
A financial audit asks whether the numbers are right. A performance audit asks whether the money did what it was meant to do, which is the question a taxpayer is usually asking.
-
Line-item adopted budget
11 ptsThe adopted budget broken out by function and object code, not a summary presentation.
Function and object detail is what allows classroom and central office spending to be compared.
-
Purchasing card transactions
9 ptsPurchasing and credit card transaction detail with merchant category, date, and amount.
Card purchases sit outside the standard purchase-order process, so separate disclosure is what makes them reviewable.
-
Payment history by category
9 ptsCumulative payments grouped by spending category, covering at least one full fiscal year.
Category totals show concentration and recurring commitments that individual payments do not.
-
Machine-readable data
9 ptsFinancial data offered as CSV, XLSX, JSON, or an open API rather than scanned images.
A scanned PDF is technically public and practically difficult to analyse. Open formats make review possible.
-
Compensation schedule
7 ptsCurrent salary schedules and aggregate administrator compensation bands, including stipends.
Payroll is the largest line in most district budgets, so schedule-level disclosure covers the bulk of spending.
-
Bond and capital disclosure
7 ptsBond program spending reported against the specific projects voters approved, with remaining balances.
Bond funds are borrowed against future taxes and authorised for a named project list, so reporting against that list closes the loop.
-
Board minutes and agendas
7 ptsMinutes and agenda packets posted together with the financial exhibits that were voted on.
The vote and its attachment are what connect a decision to the money it moved.
-
Contracts posted
6 ptsExecuted contracts and amendments above the district bid threshold, posted in full.
A payment shows the amount. The contract shows what was promised in return.
-
Direct download, no request
6 ptsCore financial records download directly, with no records request, login, or fee.
Publishing a record and releasing it on request are different levels of disclosure.
-
Published records process
4 ptsA public records page naming the responsible officer, the statutory timeline, and any fees.
A documented process tells a requester what to expect before they file.
No items have been checked yet. These fill in as each record is located and verified.