Gardiner H S District 4Budget & Spending
Gardiner, Park County, Montana NCES 3011850
- Total revenue · FY2024
- $2.4M $2,412,000
- Students enrolled
- 48
- Revenue per pupil
- $50,250
- Local share per pupil
- $33,917 98th percentile in MT
Transparency grade C, provisional
Under reviewProvisional grade
Every district starts at a provisional C until its records have been reviewed. This is a starting point, not a finding.
If you work for this district, you can shorten the wait by sending us links to the records you already publish.
NCES F-33 · FY2024
Where the money goes
Operating and capital spending from the federal expenditure survey, rolled up by function.
Aggregate categories only: no individual payees or contracts are shown.
- Instruction
- $797K 34.9% of spending
- Administration
- $178K 7.8% of spending
- Per pupil
- $47,521 All functions
- Instruction 34.9%
- Capital Outlay 32.9%
- Student Transportation 11.3%
- Instructional Staff Support 5.9%
- School Administration 4.7%
- Business & Central Services 3.7%
- General Administration 3.1%
- Student Support Services 2.0%
- Operations & Maintenance 0.7%
- Food Services 0.7%
View the numbers as a table
| Function | Amount | Per pupil | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $797,000 | $16,604 | 34.9% |
| Capital Outlay | $751,000 | $15,646 | 32.9% |
| Student Transportation | $258,000 | $5,375 | 11.3% |
| Instructional Staff Support | $134,000 | $2,792 | 5.9% |
| School Administration | $107,000 | $2,229 | 4.7% |
| Business & Central Services | $85,000 | $1,771 | 3.7% |
| General Administration | $71,000 | $1,479 | 3.1% |
| Student Support Services | $45,000 | $938 | 2.0% |
| Operations & Maintenance | $17,000 | $354 | 0.7% |
| Food Services | $16,000 | $333 | 0.7% |
| Total | $2,281,000 | $47,521 | 100% |
NCES F-33 · FY2015–FY2024
How this has changed
| Measure | FY2015 | FY2024 | Change | Nominal % | Real % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $1,558,000 | $2,412,000 | +$854,000 | +54.8% | +17.0% |
| Total expenditure | $1,335,000 | $2,522,000 | +$1,187,000 | +88.9% | +42.7% |
| Revenue per pupil | $19,974 | $50,250 | +$30,276 | +151.6% | +90.1% |
| Students enrolled | 78 | 48 | -30 | -38.5% | — |
Percent change from each measure's FY2015 level. Dollar figures are nominal as filed; the real column removes inflation using CPI-U, U.S. city average, all items, annual average (BLS). The dashed line is that same inflation curve, so a dollar line above it gained purchasing power and one below it lost. It does not apply to enrollment. Hover any point for the underlying number.
100-point rubric
What Gardiner H S District 4 needs for an A
-
Public check register
14 ptsEvery disbursement published with payee category, date, amount, and fund, updated at least quarterly.
A check register records where money actually went, rather than where it was budgeted to go.
-
Annual financial audit
6 ptsA current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report with the independent auditor opinion attached.
A financial audit confirms the statements are accurately presented. Most states require one, so it is a floor rather than a distinction.
-
Performance or efficiency audit
5 ptsAn independent review of whether spending achieved its stated purpose, published within the last three years.
A financial audit asks whether the numbers are right. A performance audit asks whether the money did what it was meant to do, which is the question a taxpayer is usually asking.
-
Line-item adopted budget
11 ptsThe adopted budget broken out by function and object code, not a summary presentation.
Function and object detail is what allows classroom and central office spending to be compared.
-
Purchasing card transactions
9 ptsPurchasing and credit card transaction detail with merchant category, date, and amount.
Card purchases sit outside the standard purchase-order process, so separate disclosure is what makes them reviewable.
-
Payment history by category
9 ptsCumulative payments grouped by spending category, covering at least one full fiscal year.
Category totals show concentration and recurring commitments that individual payments do not.
-
Machine-readable data
9 ptsFinancial data offered as CSV, XLSX, JSON, or an open API rather than scanned images.
A scanned PDF is technically public and practically difficult to analyse. Open formats make review possible.
-
Compensation schedule
7 ptsCurrent salary schedules and aggregate administrator compensation bands, including stipends.
Payroll is the largest line in most district budgets, so schedule-level disclosure covers the bulk of spending.
-
Bond and capital disclosure
7 ptsBond program spending reported against the specific projects voters approved, with remaining balances.
Bond funds are borrowed against future taxes and authorised for a named project list, so reporting against that list closes the loop.
-
Board minutes and agendas
7 ptsMinutes and agenda packets posted together with the financial exhibits that were voted on.
The vote and its attachment are what connect a decision to the money it moved.
-
Contracts posted
6 ptsExecuted contracts and amendments above the district bid threshold, posted in full.
A payment shows the amount. The contract shows what was promised in return.
-
Direct download, no request
6 ptsCore financial records download directly, with no records request, login, or fee.
Publishing a record and releasing it on request are different levels of disclosure.
-
Published records process
4 ptsA public records page naming the responsible officer, the statutory timeline, and any fees.
A documented process tells a requester what to expect before they file.
No items have been checked yet. These fill in as each record is located and verified.