Texhoma School District 61Budget & Spending
Texhoma, Texas County, Oklahoma NCES 4029820
- Total revenue · FY2024
- $4.0M $4,031,000
- Students enrolled
- 223
- Revenue per pupil
- $18,076
- Local share per pupil
- $9,054 83th percentile in OK
Transparency grade C, provisional
Under reviewProvisional grade
Every district starts at a provisional C until its records have been reviewed. This is a starting point, not a finding.
If you work for this district, you can shorten the wait by sending us links to the records you already publish.
NCES F-33 · FY2024
Where the money goes
Operating and capital spending from the federal expenditure survey, rolled up by function. Aggregate categories only: no individual payees or contracts are shown.
- Instruction
- $1.6M 44.7% of spending
- Administration
- $252K 7.2% of spending
- Per pupil
- $15,641 All functions
- Instruction 44.7%
- Student Transportation 16.5%
- Student Support Services 10.7%
- Business & Central Services 5.8%
- School Administration 5.4%
- Operations & Maintenance 4.6%
- Capital Outlay 3.9%
- Instructional Staff Support 2.9%
- Food Services 2.7%
- General Administration 1.8%
- Other Programs 0.9%
- Other Support Services 0.2%
View the numbers as a table
| Function | Amount | Per pupil | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $1,559,000 | $6,991 | 44.7% |
| Student Transportation | $576,000 | $2,583 | 16.5% |
| Student Support Services | $374,000 | $1,677 | 10.7% |
| Business & Central Services | $202,000 | $906 | 5.8% |
| School Administration | $188,000 | $843 | 5.4% |
| Operations & Maintenance | $159,000 | $713 | 4.6% |
| Capital Outlay | $136,000 | $610 | 3.9% |
| Instructional Staff Support | $100,000 | $448 | 2.9% |
| Food Services | $93,000 | $417 | 2.7% |
| General Administration | $64,000 | $287 | 1.8% |
| Other Programs | $30,000 | $135 | 0.9% |
| Other Support Services | $7,000 | $31 | 0.2% |
| Total | $3,488,000 | $15,641 | 100% |
NCES F-33 · FY2015–FY2024
How this has changed
| Measure | FY2015 | FY2024 | Change | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $3,030,000 | $4,031,000 | +$1,001,000 | +33.0% |
| Total expenditure | $2,655,000 | $3,549,000 | +$894,000 | +33.7% |
| Revenue per pupil | $9,182 | $18,076 | +$8,894 | +96.9% |
| Students enrolled | 330 | 223 | -107 | -32.4% |
Percent change from each measure's FY2015 level. Nominal dollars as filed, not adjusted for inflation. Hover any point for the underlying number.
100-point rubric
What Texhoma School District 61 needs for an A
-
Public check register
14 ptsEvery disbursement published with payee category, date, amount, and fund, updated at least quarterly.
A check register records where money actually went, rather than where it was budgeted to go.
-
Annual financial audit
6 ptsA current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report with the independent auditor opinion attached.
A financial audit confirms the statements are accurately presented. Most states require one, so it is a floor rather than a distinction.
-
Performance or efficiency audit
5 ptsAn independent review of whether spending achieved its stated purpose, published within the last three years.
A financial audit asks whether the numbers are right. A performance audit asks whether the money did what it was meant to do, which is the question a taxpayer is usually asking.
-
Line-item adopted budget
11 ptsThe adopted budget broken out by function and object code, not a summary presentation.
Function and object detail is what allows classroom and central office spending to be compared.
-
Purchasing card transactions
9 ptsPurchasing and credit card transaction detail with merchant category, date, and amount.
Card purchases sit outside the standard purchase-order process, so separate disclosure is what makes them reviewable.
-
Payment history by category
9 ptsCumulative payments grouped by spending category, covering at least one full fiscal year.
Category totals show concentration and recurring commitments that individual payments do not.
-
Machine-readable data
9 ptsFinancial data offered as CSV, XLSX, JSON, or an open API rather than scanned images.
A scanned PDF is technically public and practically difficult to analyse. Open formats make review possible.
-
Compensation schedule
7 ptsCurrent salary schedules and aggregate administrator compensation bands, including stipends.
Payroll is the largest line in most district budgets, so schedule-level disclosure covers the bulk of spending.
-
Bond and capital disclosure
7 ptsBond program spending reported against the specific projects voters approved, with remaining balances.
Bond funds are borrowed against future taxes and authorised for a named project list, so reporting against that list closes the loop.
-
Board minutes and agendas
7 ptsMinutes and agenda packets posted together with the financial exhibits that were voted on.
The vote and its attachment are what connect a decision to the money it moved.
-
Contracts posted
6 ptsExecuted contracts and amendments above the district bid threshold, posted in full.
A payment shows the amount. The contract shows what was promised in return.
-
Direct download, no request
6 ptsCore financial records download directly, with no records request, login, or fee.
Publishing a record and releasing it on request are different levels of disclosure.
-
Published records process
4 ptsA public records page naming the responsible officer, the statutory timeline, and any fees.
A documented process tells a requester what to expect before they file.
No items have been checked yet. These fill in as each record is located and verified.