Marble Falls Independent School DistrictBudget & Spending
Marble Falls, Burnet County, Texas NCES 4829010
- Total revenue · FY2024
- $70.9M $70,926,000
- Students enrolled
- 4,048
- Revenue per pupil
- $17,521
- Local share per pupil
- $13,894 84th percentile in TX
Transparency grade C, provisional
Under reviewProvisional grade
Every district starts at a provisional C until its records have been reviewed. This is a starting point, not a finding.
If you work for this district, you can shorten the wait by sending us links to the records you already publish.
NCES F-33 · FY2024
Where the money goes
Operating and capital spending from the federal expenditure survey, rolled up by function. Aggregate categories only: no individual payees or contracts are shown.
- Instruction
- $31.3M 53.0% of spending
- Administration
- $4.2M 7.1% of spending
- Per pupil
- $14,573 All functions
- Instruction 53.0%
- Student Transportation 9.3%
- Capital Outlay 7.3%
- Food Services 5.7%
- Instructional Staff Support 4.7%
- General Administration 4.7%
- Operations & Maintenance 4.2%
- Student Support Services 4.1%
- Business & Central Services 3.3%
- School Administration 2.5%
- Other Support Services 1.2%
- Other Programs 0.1%
View the numbers as a table
| Function | Amount | Per pupil | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $31,258,000 | $7,722 | 53.0% |
| Student Transportation | $5,514,000 | $1,362 | 9.3% |
| Capital Outlay | $4,320,000 | $1,067 | 7.3% |
| Food Services | $3,334,000 | $824 | 5.7% |
| Instructional Staff Support | $2,766,000 | $683 | 4.7% |
| General Administration | $2,752,000 | $680 | 4.7% |
| Operations & Maintenance | $2,465,000 | $609 | 4.2% |
| Student Support Services | $2,398,000 | $592 | 4.1% |
| Business & Central Services | $1,972,000 | $487 | 3.3% |
| School Administration | $1,456,000 | $360 | 2.5% |
| Other Support Services | $696,000 | $172 | 1.2% |
| Other Programs | $62,000 | $15 | 0.1% |
| Total | $58,993,000 | $14,573 | 100% |
NCES F-33 · FY2015–FY2024
How this has changed
| Measure | FY2015 | FY2024 | Change | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $52,506,000 | $70,926,000 | +$18,420,000 | +35.1% |
| Total expenditure | $49,340,000 | $71,895,000 | +$22,555,000 | +45.7% |
| Revenue per pupil | $12,920 | $17,521 | +$4,601 | +35.6% |
| Students enrolled | 4,064 | 4,048 | -16 | -0.4% |
Percent change from each measure's FY2015 level. Nominal dollars as filed, not adjusted for inflation. Hover any point for the underlying number.
100-point rubric
What Marble Falls Independent School District needs for an A
-
Public check register
14 ptsEvery disbursement published with payee category, date, amount, and fund, updated at least quarterly.
A check register records where money actually went, rather than where it was budgeted to go.
-
Annual financial audit
6 ptsA current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report with the independent auditor opinion attached.
A financial audit confirms the statements are accurately presented. Most states require one, so it is a floor rather than a distinction.
-
Performance or efficiency audit
5 ptsAn independent review of whether spending achieved its stated purpose, published within the last three years.
A financial audit asks whether the numbers are right. A performance audit asks whether the money did what it was meant to do, which is the question a taxpayer is usually asking.
-
Line-item adopted budget
11 ptsThe adopted budget broken out by function and object code, not a summary presentation.
Function and object detail is what allows classroom and central office spending to be compared.
-
Purchasing card transactions
9 ptsPurchasing and credit card transaction detail with merchant category, date, and amount.
Card purchases sit outside the standard purchase-order process, so separate disclosure is what makes them reviewable.
-
Payment history by category
9 ptsCumulative payments grouped by spending category, covering at least one full fiscal year.
Category totals show concentration and recurring commitments that individual payments do not.
-
Machine-readable data
9 ptsFinancial data offered as CSV, XLSX, JSON, or an open API rather than scanned images.
A scanned PDF is technically public and practically difficult to analyse. Open formats make review possible.
-
Compensation schedule
7 ptsCurrent salary schedules and aggregate administrator compensation bands, including stipends.
Payroll is the largest line in most district budgets, so schedule-level disclosure covers the bulk of spending.
-
Bond and capital disclosure
7 ptsBond program spending reported against the specific projects voters approved, with remaining balances.
Bond funds are borrowed against future taxes and authorised for a named project list, so reporting against that list closes the loop.
-
Board minutes and agendas
7 ptsMinutes and agenda packets posted together with the financial exhibits that were voted on.
The vote and its attachment are what connect a decision to the money it moved.
-
Contracts posted
6 ptsExecuted contracts and amendments above the district bid threshold, posted in full.
A payment shows the amount. The contract shows what was promised in return.
-
Direct download, no request
6 ptsCore financial records download directly, with no records request, login, or fee.
Publishing a record and releasing it on request are different levels of disclosure.
-
Published records process
4 ptsA public records page naming the responsible officer, the statutory timeline, and any fees.
A documented process tells a requester what to expect before they file.
No items have been checked yet. These fill in as each record is located and verified.