Paris Union School District 95Budget & Spending
Paris, Edgar County, Illinois NCES 1730750
- Total revenue · FY2024
- $23.0M $23,024,000
- Students enrolled
- 1,235
- Revenue per pupil
- $18,643
- Local share per pupil
- $4,055 4th percentile in IL
Transparency grade C, provisional
Under reviewProvisional grade
Every district starts at a provisional C until its records have been reviewed. This is a starting point, not a finding.
If you work for this district, you can shorten the wait by sending us links to the records you already publish.
NCES F-33 · FY2024
Where the money goes
Operating and capital spending from the federal expenditure survey, rolled up by function.
Aggregate categories only: no individual payees or contracts are shown.
- Instruction
- $9.5M 55.6% of spending
- Administration
- $1.1M 6.5% of spending
- Per pupil
- $13,775 All functions
- Instruction 55.6%
- Student Transportation 7.9%
- Capital Outlay 6.4%
- School Administration 5.8%
- Student Support Services 4.8%
- Instructional Staff Support 4.4%
- Other Support Services 3.9%
- Food Services 3.8%
- Operations & Maintenance 3.6%
- Business & Central Services 2.6%
- General Administration 0.7%
- Other Programs 0.5%
View the numbers as a table
| Function | Amount | Per pupil | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $9,465,000 | $7,664 | 55.6% |
| Student Transportation | $1,345,000 | $1,089 | 7.9% |
| Capital Outlay | $1,091,000 | $883 | 6.4% |
| School Administration | $983,000 | $796 | 5.8% |
| Student Support Services | $820,000 | $664 | 4.8% |
| Instructional Staff Support | $745,000 | $603 | 4.4% |
| Other Support Services | $666,000 | $539 | 3.9% |
| Food Services | $639,000 | $517 | 3.8% |
| Operations & Maintenance | $619,000 | $501 | 3.6% |
| Business & Central Services | $434,000 | $351 | 2.6% |
| General Administration | $120,000 | $97 | 0.7% |
| Other Programs | $85,000 | $69 | 0.5% |
| Total | $17,012,000 | $13,775 | 100% |
NCES F-33 · FY2005–FY2024
How this has changed
Summary Four points on FY2005 to FY2024
- Operating balance and scale In FY2024 the district reported $23.0M in revenue against $15.9M in current operating spending. It took in $7.1M more than it spent on operations, a margin of 30.9% of revenue. A further $1.1M went to capital outlay, 5.2% of total spending, which is typically financed by borrowing rather than out of revenue. This compares revenue with operating cost only; it is not a fund balance and not an audited result.
- Inflation and real growth Consumer prices rose +60.6% between FY2005 and FY2024. Revenue rose +74.3% and operating spending +41.8% in nominal terms. Revenue outgrew inflation, gaining +8.5% in purchasing power. Operating spending trailed inflation, losing +11.7% in purchasing power.
- Enrollment and per-pupil cost Enrollment fell by 477 students, -27.9%. Operating spending per student went from $6,560 to $12,891, +96.5% nominal and +22.3% after inflation.
- Structural takeaway Revenue grew faster than operating spending, by 32.5 percentage points over the period, with real cost per student rising while enrollment fell, so fewer students are carrying a larger real cost base. These figures describe cost, not performance: the F-33 does not say what a district was funded to do, and this site scores what a district publishes rather than how it spends.
Generated from the figures in the table below, not written by hand and not written by a model. Change the years and it recalculates.
| Measure | FY2005 | FY2024 | Change | Nominal % | Real % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $13,211,000 | $23,024,000 | +$9,813,000 | +74.3% | +8.5% |
| Total expenditure | $11,943,000 | $20,939,000 | +$8,996,000 | +75.3% | +9.2% |
| Revenue per pupil | $7,717 | $18,643 | +$10,926 | +141.6% | +50.4% |
| Students enrolled | 1,712 | 1,235 | -477 | -27.9% | — |
Percent change from each measure's FY2005 level. Dollar figures are nominal as filed; the real column removes inflation using CPI-U, U.S. city average, all items, annual average (BLS). The dashed line is that same inflation curve, so a dollar line above it gained purchasing power and one below it lost. It does not apply to enrollment. Hover any point for the underlying number.
100-point rubric
What Paris Union School District 95 needs for an A
-
Public check register
14 ptsEvery disbursement published with payee category, date, amount, and fund, updated at least quarterly.
A check register records where money actually went, rather than where it was budgeted to go.
-
Annual financial audit
6 ptsA current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report with the independent auditor opinion attached.
A financial audit confirms the statements are accurately presented. Most states require one, so it is a floor rather than a distinction.
-
Performance or efficiency audit
5 ptsAn independent review of whether spending achieved its stated purpose, published within the last three years.
A financial audit asks whether the numbers are right. A performance audit asks whether the money did what it was meant to do, which is the question a taxpayer is usually asking.
-
Line-item adopted budget
11 ptsThe adopted budget broken out by function and object code, not a summary presentation.
Function and object detail is what allows classroom and central office spending to be compared.
-
Purchasing card transactions
9 ptsPurchasing and credit card transaction detail with merchant category, date, and amount.
Card purchases sit outside the standard purchase-order process, so separate disclosure is what makes them reviewable.
-
Payment history by category
9 ptsCumulative payments grouped by spending category, covering at least one full fiscal year.
Category totals show concentration and recurring commitments that individual payments do not.
-
Machine-readable data
9 ptsFinancial data offered as CSV, XLSX, JSON, or an open API rather than scanned images.
A scanned PDF is technically public and practically difficult to analyse. Open formats make review possible.
-
Compensation schedule
7 ptsCurrent salary schedules and aggregate administrator compensation bands, including stipends.
Payroll is the largest line in most district budgets, so schedule-level disclosure covers the bulk of spending.
-
Bond and capital disclosure
7 ptsBond program spending reported against the specific projects voters approved, with remaining balances.
Bond funds are borrowed against future taxes and authorised for a named project list, so reporting against that list closes the loop.
-
Board minutes and agendas
7 ptsMinutes and agenda packets posted together with the financial exhibits that were voted on.
The vote and its attachment are what connect a decision to the money it moved.
-
Contracts posted
6 ptsExecuted contracts and amendments above the district bid threshold, posted in full.
A payment shows the amount. The contract shows what was promised in return.
-
Direct download, no request
6 ptsCore financial records download directly, with no records request, login, or fee.
Publishing a record and releasing it on request are different levels of disclosure.
-
Published records process
4 ptsA public records page naming the responsible officer, the statutory timeline, and any fees.
A documented process tells a requester what to expect before they file.
No items have been checked yet. These fill in as each record is located and verified.